Goals of Cash ,Receivable and Payable Management
Goals of Cash Management:
Precisely speaking, the primary goal of cash management in a firm
is to trade-off between liquidity and profitability in order to maximise
long-term profit. This is possible only when the firm aims at optimizing the
use of funds in the working capital pool.
This overall objective can be
translated into the following operational goals:
(i) To satisfy day-to-day
business requirements;
(ii) To provide for scheduled major payments;
(iii) To face unexpected cash drains;
(iv) To seize potential opportunities for profitable long-term
investment;
(v) To meet requirements of
bank relationships;
(vi) To build image of creditworthiness;
(vii) To earn on cash balance;
(viii) To build reservoir for net cash inflow till the
availability of better use of funds by conscious planning;
(xi) To minimize the operating cost of cash management.
Functions of Cash Management:
So as to achieve the objectives stated above, a finance manager
has to ensure that investment in cash is efficiently utilised. For that matter,
he has to manage cash collections and disbursements efficaciously, determine
the appropriate working cash balances and invest surplus cash.
Efficient cash management function calls for cash planning,
evaluation of benefits and costs, evaluation of policies, procedures and
practices and synchronization of cash inflows and outflows.
It is significant to note that cash management functions, as
depicted, are intimately interrelated and inter-wined.
Linkage among different cash
management functions has led to the adoption of the following methods for
efficient cash management:
1. Use of techniques of cash mobilisation to reduce operating
requirements of cash;
2. Major efforts to increase the precision and reliability of cash
forecasting;
3. Maximum efforts to define and quantify the liquidity reserve
needs of the firm;
4. Development of explicit alternate sources of liquidity;
5. Aggressive search for relatively more productive uses for
surplus money assets.
The above approaches involve
the following actions which a finance manager has to perform:
1. To forecast cash inflows and outflows;
2. To plan cash requirement;
3. To determine the safety level for cash;
4. To monitor safety level of cash;
5. To locate the needed funds;
6. To regulate cash inflows;
7. To regulate cash outflows;
8. To determine criteria for investment of excess cash;
9. To avail banking facilities and maintain good relations with
bankers.
Thus, for achieving the goals of cash management, a finance
manager have to, first of all, plan cash needs of the firm. This is followed by
the management of cash flows, determination of optimum level of cash and
finally, investment of surplus cash.
Importance of Cash Management:
Cash management is one of the critical areas of working capital
management and assumes greater significance because it is most liquid asset
used to satisfy the firm’s obligations but it is a sterile asset as it does not
yield anything. Therefore, finance manager has to so manage cash that the firm
maintains its liquidity position without Jeopardizing the profitability.
Problem of prognosticating cash flows accurately and absence of
perfect coincidence between the inflows and outflows of cash add to the
significance of cash management. In view of the above, at one time a firm may
experience dearth of cash because payments of taxes, dividends, seasonal inventory,
etc. build up while at other times, it may have surfeit of cash stemming out of
large cash sales and quick collections of receivables.
It is interesting to observe that in real life, management spends
his considerable time in managing cash which constitutes relatively a small
proportion of a firm’s current assets. This is why in recent years a number of
new techniques have been evolved to minimize cash holding of the firm.
Management of
Cash: Subject Matter, Motives and Other Details
Cash is the medium of exchange on the common purchasing power and
which is the most important component of working capital. It includes coins,
currency and cheques held by the firm and the balances in its bank accounts. Sometimes,
near-cash items are also included. Cash is the basic input required to keep the
firm running on a continuous basis. At the same time it is the ultimate output
expected to be realised by selling goods and services. A firm should hold
sufficient cash, neither more, nor less.
Excessive cash remains idle which simply increases the cost
without contributing anything towards the profitability of the firm, and in the
opposite case, trading and/or manufacturing operation will be disrupted. Not
only that, it largely upholds, under given condition, the quantum of other
ingredients of working capital, viz., inventories and debtors, that may be
needed for a given scale and type of inventories and debtors, that may be
needed for a given scale and type of operation.
Cash is, no doubt, a most important asset and that is why a firm
wants to get hold of it in the shortest time possible. In the absence of
sufficient quantity of cash at the proper time, payment of bills, including
dividend and others may not be made.
It is interesting to note that
cash management involves three factors:
(i) Ascertainment of a
minimum cash balance;
(ii) Proper arrangement to be made for collection and payment of
cash in such a way that minimum balance can be maintained; and
(iii) Surplus cash to be invested to temporary investments or to
be invested in fixed assets.
Similarly, cash is not productive directly like other assets,
viz., it is sterile. For example, fixed assets are acquired for the purpose of
earning revenue. Accounts receivables are generated by granting credit to
customers, etc.
Apart from the fact that it is the most liquid current asset, cash
is the common denominator to which all current assets can be reduced because
the other major current asset, viz., receivables, inventories, etc. get
converted eventually into cash.
It is the significance of cash management which is the key area of
working capital management. Cash management is important since it is very
difficult to estimate correctly the inflow f cash. Practically, it is not easy
to make a proper synchronisation of inflows and outflows of cash.
For this purpose, the firm
should develop some strategies for cash management for the following:
(a) Cost Planning:
A cash budget should be prepared for ascertaining the cash surplus
or deficit for each period of planning through the inflows and outflows of
cash.
(b) Managing the Cash Flows:
The flow of cash (inflow and outflow) should properly be managed
so that the synchronisation between inflow and outflow is possible.
(c) Optimum Cash Level:
The optimum level of cash should always be maintained, i.e. the
appropriate level of cash balance should be determined.
(d) Investing Idle Cash:
The excess or idle cash should properly be invested in order to
earn profit.
Motives for Holding Cash:
Keynes has identified three
motives for holding cash:
1. The Transactions Motive;
2. The Precautionary Motive; and
3. The Speculative Motive.
1. The Transactions Motive:
This motive refers to the holding of cash in order to meet the
day-to-day transactions which a firm carries on in the ordinary course of the
business. Primarily, these transactions include purchase of raw materials,
wages, operating expenses, taxes, dividends etc. A firm may enter into a
variety of transactions to accomplish its objectives. Similarly, there is
regular inflow of cash from revenues. Thus, the receipts and payments
constitute a continuous two-way flow of cash. Since the inflow and outflow of
cash do not perfectly synchronize, an adequate or a minimum cash balance is
required to uphold the operations if outflow exceeds the inflow. Therefore, in
order to meet the day-to-day transactions, the requirement of cash is known as
Transaction Motive. So, it refers to the holding of cash to meet anticipated
obligations when timing is not perfectly synchronised with the inflow of cash. Although
a major part of transaction balance is held in cash, a part may also be held in
the form of marketable securities whose maturity conforms to the timing of the
anticipated payments, such as payment of taxes, dividends etc.
2. The Precautionary Motive:
This motive for holding cash has to do with maintaining a cushion
or buffer to meet unexpected contingencies.
The unexpected cash needs at
short notice may be the result of:
(i) Uncontrollable circumstances, such as floods, strikes,
droughts etc.;
(ii) Bills which may be presented for settlement earlier than
expected;
(iii) Unexpected delay in collection of trade dues;
(iv) Cancellation of some order for goods due to inferior quality;
and
(v) Increase in the cost of material, labour etc.
Precautionary balances are the cash balances which are held as
reserve for random and unforeseen fluctuations in cash flows, i.e., this motive
implies the need to hold cash to meet unpredictable obligations. The more
predictable the cash flows, the less precautionary balances that are needed,
and vice versa. Moreover, the need for this type of cash balance may be reduced
if there is already borrowing power in order to meet the emergency cash
outflows. Sometimes a portion of such cash balances may be held in marketable
securities, i.e., near- money assets.
3. The Speculative Motive:
This motive refers to the holding of cash for taking advantages of
expected changes in’ security price. In other words, when the rates of interest
are expected to fall, cash may be invested in different securities so that the
firm will benefit by any subsequent fall in interest rates and rise in security
prices. On the other hand, when the rates of interest are expected to rise, the
firm should hold cash until the rise in interest rates ceases. The
precautionary motive is defensive in nature while speculative motive represents
a positive and aggressive approach.
The speculative motive helps to
take advantages of:
(i) An opportunity to purchase raw materials at a reduced price
against immediate payment, i.e., benefit of cash discounts;
(ii) A change to speculate on interest rate movements by
purchasing securities when rates of interest are expected to decline;
(iii) The purchase at favourable prices.
Level of Cash Balance:
Adequate cash balance should always be maintained by a firm. But
it does not mean that the firm should hold excessive cash balance since it is a
non-earning asset. Excessive cash balance will not only impair the firm’s
profitability but alos give a lower asset turnover ratio.
Therefore, optimum cash balance should be maintained by a firm.
For this pupose, two factors are to be considered, viz., (a) Compensating
Balances, and (b) Self-Imposed Balances.
1. Compensating Balances:
Banks serve different types of service to the firms, e.g.,
clearance of cheque, transfer of funds, against a nominal commission or fee. Generally,
clients (firms) are required to maintain a minimum cash balance at the bank
which cannot be utilised by them for transaction purposes. The bank can use the
same to earn a return. In other words, in order to compensate the services
rendered by the banks, clients/firms are required to keep a balance which will
be sufficient to earn a return equal to the cost of services. Such balances are
known as compensating balances. Sometimes, compensating balances are also
maintained when loans are granted by a bank to its customers, particularly when
the supply of credit is restricted and the rate of interest is rising. In
short, a borrower must maintain a minimum balance at bank in order to
compensate the bank against the risk of interest rate.
Therefore, compensating
balances take the following forms:
(i) An absolute minimum:
Say Rs. 10 lakhs, below which the bank balance will never be
allowed to fall.
(ii) A minimum average balance:
Say Rs. 10 lakhs, over a particular period, e.g., one month.
2. Self-Imposed Balances:
Self-imposed balance is
determined in order to consider:
(i) The need for cash and its predictability;
(ii) Interest rate or borrowing rate on marketable securities;
(iii) The fixed cost of effecting a transfer between cash and
marketable securities.
Managing of Receivables
Managing of receivables
consists of the following four factors:
1. Credit policy variables
2. Credit evaluation
3. Credit granting decision
4. Control of receivables
1. Credit policy variables:
The important dimensions of a firm’s credit policy are credit
standards, credit period, cash discount and collection effort. These variables
are related and have a bearing on the level of sales, bad debt loss, discounts
taken by customers, and collection expenses.
i) Credit standards:
A firm has a wide range of choice in this respect. At one and of
the spectrum, it may decide not to extend credit to any customer, however
strong his credit rating may be. At the other end, it may decide to grand
credit to all customers irrespective of their credit rating. Between these two
extreme positions lie several positions, often the more practical ones.
In general, liberal credit standards tend to push sales up by
attracting more customers. This is, however, accompanied by a higher incidence
of bad debt loss, a larger investment in receivables, and a higher cost of
collection. Stiff-credit standards have opposite effects. They tend to depress
sales, reduce the incidence of bad debt loss, decrease the investment in
receivables, and lower the collection cost.
ii) Credit period:
The credit period refers to the length of time customers are
allowed to pay for their purchases. It generally varies from 15 days to 60 days.
When a firm does not extend any credit, the credit period would obviously be
zero. If a firm allows 30 days, say, of credit, with no discount to induce
early payments, its credit terms are stated as “net 30”.
Lengthening of the credit period pushes sales up by inducing
existing customers to purchase more and attracting additional customers. This
is, however, accompanied by a larger investment in receivables and a higher
incidence of bad debt loss. Shortening of the credit period would have opposite
influences: It tends to lower sales, decrease investment in receivables, and
reduce the incidence of bad debt loss.
iii)Cash discount:
Firms generally offer cash discounts to induce customers to made
prompt payments. The percentage discount and the period during which it is
available are reflected in the credit terms. For example, credit terms of 2/10,
net 30 mean that a discount of 2 per cent is offered if the payment is made by
the tenth day; otherwise the full payment is due by the thirtieth day.
Liberalizing the cash discount policy may mean that the discount
percentage is increased and/or the discount period are lengthened. Such an
action tends to enhance sales (because the discount is regarded as price
reduction), reduce the average collection period (as customers pay promptly),
and increase the cost of discount.
iv) Collection Effort:
The collection programmed of the firm, aimed at timely collection
of receivables consisting of – monitoring the state of receivables, dispatch of
letters to customers whose due date is approaching, telegraphic and telephonic
advice to customers around the due date, threat of legal action to overdue
accounts and legal action against overdue accounts.
2. Credit evaluation:
Before granting credit to a prospective customer the firm should
see the credit worthiness of the customer. For knowing the credit worthiness,
three basic factors of – character, capacity and collateral are to be seen.
Character refers to the willingness of the customer to honour his obligations.
Capacity refers to the ability of the customer to pay on time. Collateral
represents the security offered by the firm in the form of mortgages.
By analysing the financial statements, by obtaining bank reference
by analysing the firm’s experience and by taking numerical credit scoring of a
customer the credit worthiness of the customer can be found.
3. Credit granting decision:
After knowing the credit worthiness of the customer, the decision
of granting credit should be taken. For taking the decision for credit the
under shown decision tree will be useful.
4. Control of receivables:
Traditionally two methods have been commonly suggested for
monitoring accounts receivable:
(i) days sales outstanding and
(ii) aging schedule.
While these methods are popularly used, they have a serious
deficiency; they are based on an aggregation of sales and receivables. To
overcome the weakness of the traditional methods, the payment pattern approach
has been suggested.
Traditional methods:
1. Days’ Sales Outstanding
(DSO):
The average days’ sales outstanding at a given time may be defined
as the ratio of receivables outstanding at that time to average daily sales
Accounts receivable at time t = Average daily sales
The average daily sales figure is obtained by taking the average
of sales during the preceding 30 days, 60 days, 90 days or some other relevant
period.
According to this method, accounts receivables are deemed to be in
control if the DSO is equal to less than a certain norm.
If the value of DSO exceeds the specified norm, collections are
considered to be slow.
2. Aging schedule:
The aging
schedule (AS) classified outstanding receivables at a given point of time into
different age brackets. An illustrative AS is given below:
Age group (in days)
|
% of receivables
|
0-30
|
35
|
31-60
|
40
|
61-90
|
20
|
> 90
|
5
|
The actual AS of the firm is compared with some standard AS to
determine whether accounts receivables are in control. A problem is indicated
if the actual AS shows a greater proportion of receivables, compared with tile
standard AS, in the higher age groups.
Limitations:
1. DSO and AS are both influenced by the pattern of sales
2. DSO is sensitive to the averaging period
3. AS is distorted when the payment relating to sales in any month
is unusual, even though payments relating to sales in other months are normal.
Modern method:
Payment pattern approach: the principal weakness of the DSO and AS
procedures is that they aggregate sales and receivables over a period of time.
Such an aggregation makes it difficult to detect changes in pattern of payment.
The payment of pattern approach overcomes this deficiency and focuses on
payment behavior, the key issue in monitoring accounts receivable.
Payment pattern is defined in terms of proportions or percentages.
To illustrate its calculation, consider a firm which sells god worth Rs. 10,000
on credit in the month of January and receives collection as follows: Rs. 1,000
in January, Rs. 4,000 in February, Rs. 3,000 in March, and Rs. 2,000 in April.
The pattern
of payments and receivables outstanding may be expressed in terms of
percentages as shown in the following table:
By matching collections and receivables to sales in the month of
origin the payment pattern approach overcomes the principal weakness of DSO and
AS methods which results from the aggregation of sales and collections.
The payment pattern approach is not dependent on sales level. It
focuses on the key issue, the payments behavior, it enables one to analyze
month-by-month payment pattern as against the combined sales and payment
patterns.
A limitation
of this method is that the conversion matrix cannot be prepared on the basis of
published financial statements alone – internal financial data are required for
it. However, the payment pattern approach is not more data-demanding than the
aging schedule method. The latter also requires internal financial data.
Over and Under Trading:
Over-Trading:
Over-trading arises only when the capital employed is inadequate
in comparison with the volume of business. In other words, it is an expansion
of sales without adequate support from capital.
That is to say, the company with limited resources tries to
increase the volume of business which, ultimately, suffers from acute shortage
of liquid funds.
This results in a Low Proprietary Ratio, Low Current Ratio and
Liquid Ratio with inadequate working capital. Under this condition, the company
does not maintain the adequate level of inventories and, as a result, it has to
depend on regular supplies. On the other hand, payments of expenses (Wages,
Salaries etc.) and Creditors including taxes cannot be made in time since there
is a serious shortage of cash.
Whether or not the company is over-trading can easily be known
after analysing certain ratios, viz., Current Ratio, Liquid Ratio, Debtor’s
Turnover Ratio, and Inventory Turnover Ratio etc. In the case of over-trading,
however, the Current Ratio and Liquid Ratio will be lower than their standard
of normal ratios but the turnover ratios will be higher than their standard of
normal ratios.
The symptoms of over-trading are discernible when:
(a) A company takes a comparatively long time to pay-off its
creditors or the amount of creditors increases in comparison with debtors, or
creditors increase more rapidly or fall more slowly than debtors.
(b) The amount of profit declines.
(c) The company increases the rate of borrowings in a way which is
quite excessive in relation to the assets owned by the shareholders.
(d) A company is buying fixed or non-current assets out of
short-term funds.
(e) Bills Payable are recorded which is not customary, and
unaccounted reduction is made in Bills Receivable which indicates discounting.
Under-Trading:
Under-trading is a condition contrary to over-trading. It is an
application of idle funds. Too much investment in current assets and smaller
amount of current liabilities results in under- trading.
The symptoms of under-trading, however, are to show:
(a) A very high Current Ratio and Liquid Ratio.
(b) Lower Turnover Ratios.
The consequence of under-trading are:
(a) Reduction in profits.
(b) Reduction in the rates of return on capital employed.
(c) Loss of Goodwill.
(d) Fall in the prices of the shares in the market.
Account Payables Management
Account Payables Management refers to the set of policies,
procedures, and practices employed by a company with respect to managing its
trade credit purchases.
In summary, they consist of seeking trade credit lines, acquiring
favorable terms of purchase, and managing the flow and timing of purchases so
as to efficiently control the company’s working capital.
The account payables of a company can be found in the short-term
liabilities section of its balance sheet, and they mostly consist of the
short-term financings of inventory purchases, accrued expenses, and other
critical short-term operations.
WHY COMPANIES FINANCE THEIR PURCHASES
Purchasing inventory, raw materials, and other goods on trade
credit allows a company to defer its cash outlays, while accessing resources
immediately.
When managed appropriately financing purchases can contribute to
effective working capital management.
A company that employs best practices with regards to payables
management can reap the benefits of stable operating cycles that provide a
stable source of operating cash flows and place it in a good liquidity position
with respect to its competitors.
OBTAINING TRADE CREDIT
Companies seeking trade credit must demonstrate that they meet
certain criteria with respect to their creditworthiness and financial
condition.
This typically entails credit analysis by the supplier.
The financial statements of the company are analyzed, paying
particular attention to its working capital, short-term liquidity and short and
long-term debt to gauge its ability to meet obligations.
The final product of such analysis is usually some form of a
credit risk rating.
PURCHASE AND PAYMENT TERMS
The purchase and credit terms obtained will depend on the
company’s risk assessment above.
Companies that are financial stable can benefit from favorable
terms (e.g. lengthy repayment periods).
For example, a company might be offered a sales on credit term of
5/10 net 30 implies a 5% discount on the purchase amount if payment is made
within 10 days of billing date.
If the discount is not taken, the full invoiced amount is due in
30 day.
MANAGING PAYMENTS
After entering into purchase agreements with a supplier, the
company has the responsibility of fulfilling its payment obligations.
The Accounts Payable department is accountable for this function,
and performs tasks such as communicating with suppliers, sending payments and
reconciling bank records, as well as updating and performing related accounting
entries
Managing payables also include the expense administration with
respect to the company’s own employees.
Expenses such as employee travelling, meals, entertainment, and
other costs related to doing business for the company are administered by the
payables department and must be managed appropriately.
EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF PAYABLES
MANAGEMENT
Accounts payable are one of 3 main components of working capital,
along with receivables and inventory.
Understanding how these 3 accounts interact among each other and
the resulting effects on working capital levels, cash flow, and the operating
cycle can help in managing and evaluating payables management.
An appropriate balance must be struck, whereby the advantage of
deferring cash outlays using trade credit is weighted against the risk of
excessive short-term credit.
It is therefore important to maintain optimal utilization of
credit lines and timing of payments, and create a balance between the need for
cash, working capital, and liquidity.
A number of metrics and short-term financial ratios can be used to
evaluate the performance payables management.
Payables Turnover Ratio
Management can use this ratio to measure the average number of
times a company pays its suppliers in a particular period.
A higher number than the industry average indicates the company
pays its suppliers at a faster rate than its competitors, and is generally
conducive to short-term liquidity.
Days in Payables Outstanding
(DPO)
Measuring the average length of time it takes a company to pay for
its short-term purchases in a period, the DPO can be used by management to
determine an optimal timing of payments for its payables.
An important measure of the length of time required to turn
inventory purchases into sales, and subsequently into cash receipts.
Using the CCC, management can assess the interaction of payables
with the 2 other working capital accounts: receivables and inventory, and the
resulting effects on cash flow.
A low CCC is highly desirable. A company can shorten the CCC by
for example, lengthening its terms of purchases.
Net Working Capital (NWC)
NWC is the difference between current assets and current
liabilities. High levels are desirable for short-term liquidity.
A decreasing pattern or trend in NWC can be attributed to
increasing levels of payables, and thus can serve as a warning sign of
excessive short-term credit.
A negative NWC (particularly when persistent) is a red flag for a
lack of liquidity or potential insolvency.
Current and Quick Ratio
Two other
liquidity measures, the current ratio expresses
the NWC equation above as a ratio between current assets and current
liabilities. Holding all else equal, rising A/P levels will reduce both the
current and quick ratio. These ratios can be used to assess the impact of
increasing payables on short-term liquidity.
CONCLUSION
The Accounts payable of a company is an important working capital
account. Effective payables management can enhance a company’s short-term cash
flow position through the design of optimal timing of payments to suppliers.
However, important considerations should be given to excessive
financing, as that has a direct impact on the credit risk of the company and
its short-term liquidity.
The goals of cash management revolve around maintaining liquidity, optimizing cash resources, minimizing risks, enhancing financial stability, and supporting both short-term operational needs and long-term strategic objectives. Effective cash management is a critical aspect of overall financial management for businesses and individuals. Business cashflow forecasting software
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing needful information!
ReplyDeleteThis is useful for those who is looking for tax audit lawyer. Keep Sharing such information blog.